Essay on Athletics During the COVID 19 Pandemic

Abstract

COVID-19 has had so many social effects, so confinement based on social isolation is needed to restore global health through the virus’s non-distribution. Both the sports industry and athletes have been in an unexpected condition where athletes cannot compete because of quarantine and health insurance. The world of sport has canceled all competition dates in individual sports and sports by teams to guarantee athletes and the general public’s health. The most important indication of this was that the Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic Games were postponed to 21 July 2021 on 24 March 2020. Research has shown that Athletes are affected adversely by the excessive inactivity influence and lack of contact between teammates and coaches. This has led to the end of careers for some athletes and coaches, finding a new way of living. Clubs have been shut down due to an increase in taxation by the governments. These findings will increase visibility and encourage athletic organizations to provide appropriate standards so that their membership is adequately preserved and the sporting events can be resumed optimally. In this respect, social activities, characteristic of team sports, are essential to maintain resilience and psychological stability. Via a simple contact, the athletes may enhance their adaptive stress response by individually handling the new rules and steps.

Introduction

Athletics and sporting activities contribute significantly to a country’s economic and social growth. The role of Athletics in promoting the advancement of women and young people, individuals, and populations and health, learning, and social integration goals is well known by authorities, including in a political declaration of Agenda 2030. The COVID-19 pandemic has spread to almost every country in the world since its inception. This paper starts by discussing the social, sports life of athletics as influenced by covid 19. It then shows how sports would influence social life for athletes and the general public during the Covid 19 pandemic. Therefore I support the norm that athletics should have been allowed to open but with stringent measures to curb the spread of the virus.

Quarantine induced some health and performance disturbances for athletes. The detractive effect is observed from two and four weeks, and the absence of equipment and adequate local preparation can render combating difficult. It may induce post-traumatic syndrome, confusion, rage, and sleep disruption, beyond reduced physical ability. Once athletes have limited training time and sedentary behavior, many damaging consequences during quarantine can occur. Physical tiredness, increased time with video play, smartphones, and reading may induce tiredness, also known as mental tiredness. It damages cognitive performance such as decision-making, inhibitor function, and focus and can decrease the incentive to do subsequent tasks. Therefore, repeated exposure to high cognitive functions should be avoided to prevent cognitive performance and decline in motivation. Therefore, it is essential to develop and implement strategies that nullify or mitigate these harmful effects. Furthermore, smartphones and video games minimize sleep time and consistency that are important for athlete’s health and success.

The athletes ought to take care of the patterns of their sleep. The Quarantine time has led to many improvements in the routine in which high-performance athletes have to find new approaches to maintaining their workout schedule through improvisation of both home space and safety training equipment. This may culminate in constant episodes of sleep deprivation caused by frequent circadian rhythm shifts. In this respect, previous studies have shown that lack of sleep influences immune response by modulating aspects of the immune system, such as antibody responses.

Exercise has been linked to improved vaccination, immune response, and markers of the blood vaccine. General exercise is one of the most common behavioral public health objectives, conveniently illustrated by the litany of diseases that can be improved by exercise. The impact on metabolic syndrome, insulin sensitivity, cardiovascular disease, breast colon cancer, dementia and depression, and all-inclusion mortality is related to inflammation with the immune system. Due to changes in host immune response and the adverse reaction of COVID-19, physical practice is possible as an ideal method to fight infection and COVID-19 symptoms. However, there can be some physical and mental impairments due to the need to readjust athletes’ bodies and minds to new individual and sports schedules. Exercises result in many reactions, including cardiovascular, nervous, immune, endocrine, and neurological responses, which do not work alone. We contend that the modifications caused by acute exercise are prepared for vaccine challenges, such as antigen challenges. A systemic view of homeostasis implies a complexity analysis. We must analyze the whole picture when contemplating the specific aspects to comprehend the ability to prosper under different circumstances.

Very few businesses had such a significant impact on competitive sports, in which payments, prize money, and livelihoods of those involved seem to have been severely and urgently impacted by the cancelation of a single game, tournament, or even match. It is suggested that such stresses have been felt on many occasions, in which clubs and organizations dependent on membership or dues have currently had their activities reduced. However, these economic stresses were unevenly faced for lack of income, disturbance in athletic work and wages, problems with cash flow, unemployment and loss of freelance commissions, loss of volunteer service, and market strategy shifts. Timeframe, seasonality, and schedules are among the reasons that certain clubs are likely to be involved rather than those with which the pandemic fell during the off-season. In the middle of their seasonal events, the main tournament or festival is about to take place. However, this remains unclear since alleviating and controlling such issues will be challenging in terms of cost. If athletics and sporting activities were not closed, this issue would not be of importance. This remains uncertain, though, as it would be costly to alleviate and control those problems. This problem would not be significant unless athletics and sports activities were closed.

Sport is widely organized (used in its broadest sense) by regional, state, local leagues, associations, and other local organizations that encourage and sustain sports populations in Europe. This organization is also founded on a logic that has been developed over decades, which shows the value of sport in its physical characteristics but also in its capacity to promote sociability by mutually supportive societies (Andersen). Many of us agree that socializing with the sport can significantly improve physical, emotional, and social well-being. The effects overweight these traps largely, even though we are skeptical of the effectiveness of sport to promote these benefits. Therefore, this is evident that the closure of sporting and athletics has impacted our lives today.

After the lockdown on athletic and sporting activities, socio-economic inequality arose primarily in athletic industries. For example, in footballers, one party with less scrutiny is professional footballers, often due to direct political interference (France24). The UK health minister, for instance, called personally for professionals to make salary concessions and then agreed to give players an initiative directly to health services in the United Kingdom. Pro athletes in most situations have faced limited salary cuts (typically 10-30 percent) since their active football was suspended. However, this argument seems to be based around the notion that ‘footballers’ are consistently too rich to act immediately, an argument that overlooks the fact that players in top feminine groups, college contract players, or club players outside Europe’s top divisions are unlikely to be able to spend huge sums on medical care. These hypotheses about sport and sportspeople underline implicit standards and disparities in this particular sport based on gender and class and are, without a doubt, worth studying.

Oddly, the pressure to contribute funds was rarely extended to others, including club owners, advertisers, and television companies, who pay the player’s salary first. Such absences reflect the severe socio-economic gaps and inadequate financial service structures subjected to this unique crisis for non-player workers and grassroots clubs. While players have taken a small payroll across Europe and beyond, many non-players have lost their jobs, or team owners have in some cases approached governments for salary coverage for financial assistance. In some places, especially in the UK, the shareholders’ and clubs’ behavior was greeted with outrage. The result was the swift revival of the decision of some clubs in the UK (e.g., Liverpool FC) to include non-player personnel in the “furlough” program, which was intended to ensure 80% of British government salaries. Elite sports have been examined for their financial feasibility. There are essential debates when writing about producing timetables to revive different Leagues and tournaments (discussions into which governments and politicians have had significant input). It is an unequivocally political challenge to promote the sporting industry without jeopardizing the welfare of the athletes, the fan, or other personnel.

Moreover, those observations are pertinent to sport at the elite or world level. Political and sport policy issues are more and more the subject of the local and national programs. A primary concern, from swimming pools, fitness centers, sports leagues, organizers, and volunteer clubs, is how to uphold urban sports facilities, for example (van der Poel). Governors and boards manage and adapt their organizations to these turbulent times are vital for sport in the future.

There is no debate about the pandemic’s changing, pausing, or even ceasing sports participants’ daily life and activity, not to mention sports athletes. For those who mentor or educate athletes, the way we interact with and advise players in sports must be fundamentally restructured. Coaches, in particular, would probably need to discuss several important issues such as how to track athletics, illness, and other fitness input due to the gap between coach and athlete. This might hinder the efficacy of certain coaching instruction types in sport, where technology and expertise are paramount. Moreover, coaching programs are expected to adopt when trainers and players do not have proximity, contributing, for example, to the replacement of technique-based coaching and conditioning activities. Similarly, coaches and teachers are likely to change their capacity to ensure the growth of cooperation and membership within teams. This time, away from the sites, swimming pools, and tracks, coaches will also focus on their practice and partake in talks with the CPD or other coaches and practicers around various sports communities and landscapes, contributing to improvements in teaching philosophy, conduct, and practice. In California, for example, the decision was taken to minimize interaction by shorter physical education while underlining the value of becoming involved (Evans). Had it not been for sports events to be locked down? It is unclear how dissonant advice has been obtained. Specific aspects need to be examined to see how, when, and the implications of these modifications and what best practices should be understood.

It is also regrettable that the sport experience has probably changed. It seems that sport alone in a more quiet open environment or at home alone or in family gatherings that interaction with others through a camera and tablet is being experienced gradually through an international lockout and social distancing laws. There are signs that monitoring technologies, increasing email activities, and online courses could become more popular, but there are yet compelling facts. (Gerrish). It would be essential to monitor how much area and a more significant proportion of sports activities are used for digitizing sports begun before the COVID-19 pandemic. The same goes for more and more promoted outdoor competition in individual ‘events,’ as community sports’ tradition can be undermined. Indeed, outdoor sports in Europe are becoming increasingly common (Scheerder). Yet, in the face of sometimes conflicting advice to remain indoors in certain countries, it is essential to see if this upward trend is further stimulated by the COVID 19 pandemic. While fitness in the natural world is often thought to be effective in several respects, the sociological investigation should also concentrate on the effect of decreased sociality in sport and exercise (McNarry). Likewise, more people would probably adjust the way senses are perceived and used in sport; those senses will undoubtedly be reduced to emphasize visual and kinaesthetic behavior, which changes the opportunity for players, instructors, and trainers to exchange feedback.

It should be studied from positive and negative angles how a systemic change in sport and suspensions, delays, and cancellations of different athletic competitions have impacted the well-being and sense of self of many athletes (Southcombe). For example, the delay of significant events and leagues for certain athletes can represent a significant obstacle to advancement in careers or the road to contract redevelopment, or even an early driver to compulsory retirement. For those like those recovering from drugs or an administrative ban on injuries or early career, maybe it is a new way of doing more out of a missed season or extending a season, event, or competition (Koukouris). Finally, because of challenges many athletes encounter after similar biographically traumatic events such as retirement. The effect of delay and cancelation is crucial to consider on the sense of self, including their status as athletes, mental health, and the athlete’s biography.

Many of the athletes now undergo various situations that impact their careers. This problem emerges when sports are locked up. For example, athletes can experience disorders of fitness, diminished enthusiasm, athletic-free life pressure during the locks and ultimately have to withdraw, stand down or deny the chance to attend an athletic event. Athletes should first adapt to this situation and take the time to decide for retirement and look at the obstacles and opportunities (Park). The challenges in this context may include but are not limited to: the shift of a career to non-athletic (for example, education, work, family); reorganizing social positions (inside the micro and macro-environment), dealing with the change in self-identity (making the lifestyle more important to athletic identities) In the face of these obstacles, athletes are opening a new page for (life) greatness through sports capital.

The COVID-19 crisis should be seen from a trauma viewpoint. The traditions of competition and sport are expected to turn around (Horesh). For the reasons that athletes excel, values have a sense of mission and motivate them to achieve short and long-term career goals. On the other hand, the COVID-19 pandemic has become a threat to the significance of society’s ideals on sport (those are social values). The values that each player retains have, on the other hand, been shook (i.e., individual values). Personal values can also be classified into terminal values and tool values. Terminal values are about the end state of life (for example, “my ultimate goal of playing sport is to be remembered and known”), while instrumental values are about behavior (e.g., fairness, “one thing that leads me to be honest”). Any players are struggling with social ideals and personal values. When beliefs are rocked, it is impossible to remain inspired. Sports enthusiasts may become active values co-creators and are no longer passive recipients of merit. Connection on SNS to people worldwide will help an athlete because of social differences (Kolyperas). Many athletes, though, may even make their SNS interactive, negative, and blunt remarks that harm their beliefs in turn.

Conclusion

Since the shutdown began, Covid 19 pandemic has had a significant effect on the lives of athletes. It is clear that in this lockdown time, players, coaches, and clubs have significantly lost. The training times of athletes have decreased, and the passive conduct has increased. The sensitivity of athletes, especially young athletes, leads to lower performance and decreased motivation to these high cognitive activities. The revenues for coaches have been limited, and athletes are not educated. When their governments increase fees, clubs suffer deficits in terms of finance and budgeting. This is important because athletes’ fitness and results have been compromised, some of them being unable to go to work. On the other hand, coaches and coaches had to find additional work to help them live until the pandemic ends. Clubs were required to stop paying taxes to inadequate funds. In cooperation with health clubs, sports organizations, and Athletes associations, the states should also find ways to get athletic events out of the lockdown.

References

Andersen, M. H. (2019). The social and psychological health outcomes of team sport participation in adults. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health,, 832-858.

Evans, A. B. (2020). Sport in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal for Sport and Society.

France24. (2020, April 15th). Townsend hits out at UK health minister for ‘blaming’ footballers.

Gerrish, D. (2020). Together: What does Coronavirus mean for the digital future of the physical activity sector. https://www.ukactive.com/blog/together-what-does-coronavirus-mean-for-the-digital-future-of-the-physical-activity-sector/.

Horesh, D. &. (2020). Traumatic stress in the age of COVID-19: A call to close critical gaps and adapt to new realities. psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy.

Kolyperas, D. M. (2019). Sport fans’ roles in value co-creation. European Sport Management Quarterly,.

Koukouris, K. (2005). Premature athletic disengagement of elite Greek gymnasts. European Journal for Sport and Society, 35-56.

McNarry, G. A.-C. (2020). Doing’ competitive swimming: Exploring the skilled practices of the competitive swimming lifeworld. International Review for the Sociology of Sport,.

Park, S. ,. (2012). Exploring the retirement from sport decision-making based on the transtheoretical model. Psychology of Sport and Exercise.

Scheerder, J. B. (2015). Running across Europe: The rise and size of one of the largest sport markets. Springer.

Southcombe, M. (2020). Joe Marler won’t miss a game despite long ban for grabbing Alun Wyn Jones’ testicles as ‘secret’ Six Nations meeting emerges. https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/joe-marler-wont-miss-game-18148172.

Van der Poel, H. (2020). What do the corona measures mean for sports and exercise. Retrieved from https://www.mulierinstituut.nl/actueel/wat-betekenen-de-coronamaatregelen-voor-sport-en-bewegen/.