Essay on Colonization of Africa

In the nineteenth century, Africa was dominated by a European power, whereby they performed brutal punishment to the Africans. King Leopold’s story is a powerful and horrifying narrative that accounts for the brutal aggression of territory from Africans’ power (Lowes pp 76). The story is a belief preview that aims provision of administration and acquisition of colonies. The book explains the power of King Leopold from Belgium. In this story, King Leopold is known as genocidal and uses his ability to loot, brutalize and slash African populations ruthlessly, thus promoting humanitarianism in the African countries.

The book takes us through the colonization and occupation of African territories by the Europeans back in the nineteenth century. This story opens up a better understanding of King Leopold as the main character of the Ghost story. Under his characterization, King Leopold can be seen as the leading participant in Ghost’s story (Sara, pp 234). According to the article, King Leopold privately controlled the entire Congo State without any government consultation. The book characterizes King Leopold as a unique character due to his robust control. The nature of being brave elevates King Leopold as the core participant of the Ghost story.

I agree with King Leopold’s character since he can show his firmness across the Congo State. Leopold uses his power to strip the country’s property basically in the form of ivory and rubber. King Leopold’s leadership is characterized by several slaveries and brutal punishment due to his doctorship form (Justin, pp 46). King Leopold’s geographical concepts were basically at Tyranny and Terror, where he could easily control Congo State. Under Leopold’s direction, he regularly visited the area to demolish the favorable truces from several local leaders.

Over many years ago, a series of the militarized posts were established along the Congo and rail lines constructed from the Leoville coast. Basing the book, King Leopold is seen as a paramount king but rules under his brutal punishment. Under his commands, native civilians were forced to gather the ivory and transport it for foreign export (Nunn pp 12). According to the story, King Leopold is characterized as inhuman and brutal, which has led to humanitarian factors. The establishing of his geographical concepts contributed to the displacement of the native people.

Basing the Author’s perspective, this context aims to understand colonization and globalization of power since the 19^th century. The book outlines various aspects of the colonization and how European acquired territories from the African leaders. King Leopold is described in this context as the main character who has applied his superiority in the acquisition of the African regions. In his misuse of the Congo, this book argues that Leopold facilitated future economic and political problems resulting in endless chaos (Justin, pp 46). According to the Author’s findings, it’s true that Leopold acquired the kingdom in unethical ways; thus, the chances of the people to thrive under his leadership are limited.

These findings are proven from the overview of the King Leopold story, whereby the writer characterizes King Leopold as inhuman since he applies brutal punishment in his leadership. Basing the writer’s arguments, Congo has been ruled by abusive and brutal regimes due to King Leopold’s original power acquisition. King Leopold’s type of colonization took a long time, was eventually sold to his mother country Belgium. The succession of King Leopold’s leadership by his mother country signified continuous misuse of the Congo people. This finding draws clear evidence Congo has not yet enjoyed its sovereignty due to its constant oppression from various dictators.

The story argues that European colonization has promoted several African countries besides King Leopold’s brutality. The author of the report shows that colonization has enabled western education in most African countries. According to the context, the author uses narrative style to present his arguments. Firstly, the author narrates King Leopold’s historical background and his power acquisition in African countries. This type of writing is mainly used to give a historical experience of a particular event.

The most exciting part of this King Leopold story Is his determination and braveness to conquer the African territories. The story builds determination and courage to the historians since it shows everything is possible (Blocher pp 67). Additionally, the book is characterized by King Leopold’s extraordinary aspects; thus, it is an influential aspect to most historian readers. According to my perspective, King Leopold’s context is among the exciting narrative since it informs the historian how the acquisition of the power it was initially.

The story gives a background understanding of the colonization since the 19^th century. I would recommend that historians read and understand King Leopold story since it will enlighten them more about the colonization of the As historians. There is to need to have background understanding of how colonization occurs and understand the impacts of colonization. In most cases, historians can only achieve this knowledge by having intensive learning of historical books.

In conclusion, King Leopold’s story explains the colonization and acquisition of African power. The book enlightens all the readers, mostly on the acquisition of African territories. The Author of the book narrates King Leopold’s history and his dominance over the African states’ colonization back in the 19^th century. Although King Leopold’s characters sound inhuman, I recommend the historian students draw the book’s attention since they will get more information regarding colonization.

Work cited

Pappas, Sara. “Fragments of the Past: The Petit Palais, the Exposition Universally, and the Ghosts of French Imperialism.” Dix-Neuf 24.2-3 (2020): 245-259.

Podur, Justin. “The Politician’s Words Against the Empire’s Weapons.” America’s Wars on Democracy in Rwanda and DR Congo. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2020. 29-46.

Lowes, Sara, and Eduardo Montero. “King Leopold’s Ghost. The Legacy of Labour Coercion in the DRC.” The Long Economic and Political Shadow of History. Volume II. Africa and Asia (2017): 76-87.

Blocher, Joseph, Mitu Gulati, and Kim Oosterlinck. “King Leopold’s Bonds and the Odious Debts Mystery.” Va. J. Int’l L. 60 (2019): 487.

Nunn, Nora. “The Unbribable Witness: Image, Word, and Testimony of Crimes against Humanity in Mark Twain’s King Leopold’s Soliloquy (1905).” Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal 12.2 (2018): 7.