Essay on Impact of Sewerage Construction on Urban Development

Introduction

Infrastructure is the basic system that undergirds the structure of an economy. Infrastructural intervention is central to urban development, and it largely stimulates land development to a large extent (Morgan, 2005). Planners and policymakers must integrate sewer, transport, water, power, and telecommunication lines to successfully induce construction (Carey, 1998). Infrastructure mainly serves as building services, and they make a place habitable, usable, and comfortable. It is important to examine specific sets of infrastructure and how their intervention affects construction within major cities in the world. In specific, the study concentrates on highlighting how the intervention of sewers and tall buildings affect the operations and infrastructural development in major cities across the world such as Atlanta. Notably, construction of several infrastructures requires proper planning, especially when such buildings are close to the highways and roads. Innovation and the use of native techniques are important to integrate with new and modern methods of architecture (Kostof, 1991). The paper explores how sewerage construction of sewer lines impacts setting up of various structures in major cities.

Sewer Lines and Cities

Most cities in the world are densely populated, which makes it necessary to plan effectively how waste can be eliminated without causing problems. The high number of people in such cities has resulted in an increase in waste and sewerage that impacts health and construction of various structures within a city (Kostof, 1991). For instance, every city should be fitted with the right infrastructure to support proper hygiene for its residents. Ignoring construction of proper sewer lines in cities can result in a fatal problem than just putting them in place. It is the duty of city authorities o ensure that construction of sewer lines is done in a way that does not affect many operations for people. Cities are better placed to sustain residents when they refitted with proper sewer lines for improved hygiene (Dehaene and De Cauter, 2008). It is important to examine how the construction of sewer lines affects a city’s urban development, especially on infrastructure.

Sewer Lines in Cities and how they Impact Building Construction

A developing city must have comprehensive plans in place to ensure that its residents are protected from health hazards that might be associated with sewer management. During the construction of sewer lines, much of the utilized land is underground, which makes it necessary for designers o take into consideration such a fact (Jordan, 2004). Constructing buildings without assessing the condition and presence of sewer lines might be detrimental to a city’s general development. For instance, t6ll buildings that are constructed close to sewer lines should be supported with strong foundations to avoid issues that might arise due to vibrations. Tall buildings and other structures with cities such as Atlanta are well structured to ensure safety for those doing the construction and residents of the town (Dehaene and De Cauter, 2008). Construction of infrastructural facilities within any city is highly reliant on the other factors such as developing of the might sewer lines for residents of the city.

Sewer lines and Other Important Facilities

It is important to note that the construction of sewer lines in a city affects how the city is planned and rearranged to accommodate various facilities. For instance, schools for children should not be built close to sewerage lines and dumping centres. Institutions of learning and health facilities should be placed in a place that supports respective activities for the better part of the city. Atlanta’s Gulch is one of the examples of projects whose interventions have affected operations and infrastructural development (Dal Co, 1979). Sewer lines within a town are an influential part in that those stadiums and other facilities such as hospitals are constructed away from them. The systems weaken the foundation for tall buildings, hence the need to strategically design the construction of various facilities, in the event of functioning sewer lines within a city.

Sewerage, Water and sanitation

A developed urban region is a clean one, and therefore water and sanitation are critically needed. Construction processes need a lot of clean water. If water availability is a great challenge, then the construction process will be challenged (Dal Co, 1979). When the construction is complete, water systems are required for the occupants’ proper running of activities. Therefore water is important during and after construction. When this is availed, the area is said to be developed. Sanitation is a wide spectrum in an urban area, and it ranges from sewer systems to waste disposal sites and recycling points. Before construction is commenced, site analysis should locate the main sewer line, which determines how the construction is organized (Mead, 1995). Sewer lines are put in place by planers, and they use gravity to run to avoid the cost of pumping. Maintenance of the sewer system is also an important factor for the development of an urban region. Where the sewer lines leak and overflow to unwanted areas, they cause hygiene hazards and can be a threat to urban development (Dehaene and De Cauter, 2008). If this is not avoided, it discourages the development of the urban area, and construction is avoided since the places pose health dangers. Water, sanitation, and waste disposal management take a large share of the total construction expenses that are to e incurred, and the cost used to run the building. However, it is regarded as being marginal in the entire process (Jordan, 2004). However, other parts within the zoning restrictions regulate these services, making them difficult to access and use. Therefore, if the area is underdeveloped and they exist, then they are poorly maintained.

Water is essential for sewerage treatment and maintenance of a clean city such as Atlanta, Dubai, and Beijing. Lack of water subjects the town into a serious problem that impacts the development of various infrastructural facilities. Authorities have to ensure that construction takes into account important aspects that promote and sustain life.

Link between Sewer Construction and Urban Development

The rapid growth rate of the urban population and the boundary expansion of the urban area create numerous concerns about the housing of the people. These factors call for the provision of more housing units and the construction industries to create jobs (Dehaene and De Cauter, 2008). With continued construction, land as a resource becomes inadequate. Also, essential services, such as water and electricity being scarce. Adequate measures such as urban sustainability have to be rapidly adopted and planned for by the authorities involved with urban and regional planning. Urban sustainability should mainly aim at ensuring that every citizen or urban dwellers’ life is considered and upgraded. These are measures such as affordable housing with the provision of essential services at minimal cost without the aim of reaping profits (Kiang, 2007). Also, sanitation should be provided in such a way that the unemployed population is employed to manage waste.

Increased population calls for the building of schools within urban areas. With response to city planning guidelines being followed, zoning allows for educational facilities in some parts of urban areas. In turn, proximity to schools will call for the construction of residential units where students do not have to walk for long distances (McIntyre, 2010). These interrelations of social amenities are the defining factors for a developed urban area where essential services are in close but reasonable proximity. These units call for heavy construction work in the regions. Again, health services are important to the region. The British government has been putting in place billions of pounds in an improvement of healthcare-related construction works. With these, numerous construction activities in urban areas have raised environmental friendly concerns. They suggest that the construction of health facilities produces a lot of waste, which is due to its complexity (McIntyre, 2010). The need to satisfy their intended construction purpose makes it difficult to prevent wastes from such facilities in urban areas. However, discussions and studies have been conducted to determine whether these waste concerns are true. Findings show that if the construction consultants do not do their work properly, such problems are likely to occur. To add to that, if the waste issues arise from the construction sites, sanitation, and waste disposal issues come in (Thalis and Cantrill, 2013). With the existence of residential areas, urban centres will need a hospital to serve the schools, offices, and the existence of these amenities calls for a large capacity hospital in the area. The hospital serves a high number of people, including construction workers in the urban area that depend on the facility.

Conclusion

In conclusion, for urban development to be realized, infrastructural development and construction cannot be overlooked. To some extent, urban development does not occur without infrastructural changes that support life within the town. The paper takes into account the impact of sewer intervention within cities and how it shapes urban development. For instance, the construction of tall buildings and other facilities within a city is impacted by the available drainage and sewerage options. The availability of developed infrastructural systems encourages the construction of new buildings serving different purposes. These approaches have been put in place with the current trends in modern cities such as Dubai and Atlanta. Construction of facilities such as hospitals, stadia, institutions and tall buildings must take into account the existing sewer and drainage lines to a large extent.

References

Carey, L., 1998. NEW IFE: REBIRTH OF A NATION. City, Space Plus Globalization, p.136.

Dal Co, F., 1979. From parks to the region: Progressive ideology and the reform of the American city. The American city: From the civil war to the new deal, pp.143-291.

Dehaene, M. and De Cauter, L., 2008. Heterotopia in a postcivil society. In Heterotopia and the City (pp. 15-22). Routledge.

Jacobs, J., 2016. The death and life of great American cities. Vintage.

Jordan, D.P., 2004. Haussmann and Haussmannisation: the legacy for Paris. French Historical Studies, 27(1), pp.87-113.

Kiang, H.C., 2007. Chinese public space: A brief account. In Globalization, the city and civil society in Pacific Asia (pp. 97-121). Routledge.

Koskela, H., 2000. ‘The gaze without eyes’: video-surveillance and the changing nature of urban space. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), pp.243-265.

Kostof, S., 1991. The city shaped: Urban patterns and meanings through history.

Macarthur, J., 2000. From the air: Collage City, aerial photography and the picturesque’. Architectural Review (January 1919, Vol 45), 4, p.9.

McIntyre, N.E., 2010. Urban ecology: definitions and goals. In The Routledge handbook of urban ecology (pp. 31-40). Routledge.

Mead, C., 1995. Urban contingency and the problem of representation in second empire Paris. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 54(2), pp.138-174.

Morgan, L., 2005. The Early Modern” Trompe-L’Oeil” Garden. Garden History, pp.286-293.

Morris, A.E.J., 2013. History of urban form before the industrial revolution. Routledge.

Pundt, H.G., 1967. KF Schinkel’s Environmental Planning of Central Berlin. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 26(2), pp.114-130.

Rabaça, A., 2016. Le Corbusier, the city, and the modern utopia of dwelling. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 40(2), pp.110-120.

Thalis, P. and Cantrill, P.J., 2013. Public Sydney: drawing the city. Historic Houses Trust of New South Wales and Faculty of the Built Environment, University of New South Wales.